Live · --:--:-- UTC
← Back to us news feed
LATESTSource: variety.com

Pink Explains Slamming Macklemore’s Pro-Palestine Performances, Acknowledges Heavy Backlash: ‘I’m Standing Up for My Own People, and I Thought I Knew How Lonely That Would Be. It’s Lonelier Than That’

Published September 11, 2026 · US

Pink Explains Slamming Macklemore’s Pro-Palestine Performances, Acknowledges Heavy Backlash: ‘I’m Standing Up for My Own People, and I Thought I Knew How Lonely That Would Be. It’s Lonelier Than That’

Pink had fallen silent in the face of backlash from many quarters following her reposting a call for Macklemore to be dropped from the Ed Sheeran tour in the wake of his nightly pro-Palestinian songs and statements. Now she has spoken up about the controversy…

In a rare and extensive statement, singer Pink has responded to the intense backlash she faced following her social media activity concerning Macklemore’s pro-Palestinian performances during the Ed Sheeran tour. The controversy erupted after Pink reposted calls for Macklemore to be removed from the tour due to his nightly public support of Palestine, sparking widespread debate and criticism.

Pink’s response came nearly a week after the initial uproar, delivered in a detailed social media post exceeding 1,300 words. She clarified that her reposting of an anti-Macklemore message was a spur-of-the-moment act rather than a fully articulated personal stance, admitting that social media often encourages hasty reactions. Determined to present her views in her own words, she emphasized the importance of being judged for her actual opinions rather than the content of a reposted meme.

The singer recounted her evolving relationship with Macklemore, initially supportive of his 2014 performance of "Same Love" at the Grammys, where he championed LGBTQ+ marriage equality. However, Pink recalled a subsequent incident when Macklemore wore a costume perceived as anti-Semitic, which he later apologized for. This episode, she suggested, shaped her perception of his later actions and statements.

Recent video

Selected for this story · Published within the last two years

Watch on YouTube

The pivotal moment that prompted Pink’s public objection was Macklemore’s recent concert performance in front of a large family audience, where he displayed graphic war images and dedicated a song to a movement aligned with pro-Palestinian activism. Pink was particularly disturbed when Macklemore addressed Jewish attendees, stating his message was not directed at them, a declaration she found dismissive of Jewish concerns.

Throughout her statement, Pink made clear that she does not claim to represent any government or speak on behalf of Israel. She reiterated her stance from an earlier statement in October 2023, affirming that she views Hamas as a terrorist organization while advocating for a future that respects the humanity and rights of Palestinians. Emphasizing her background as a UNICEF ambassador, she expressed profound sorrow for the suffering of children on all sides of conflict zones.

Pink explained that her reaction was not aimed at the slogan "Free Palestine" itself, which she supports as a right to free speech, but rather at Macklemore’s on-stage commentary that appeared to dismiss Jewish fears and experiences. She articulated a desire to express the fear and concern felt by herself and others in the Jewish community without being accused of endorsing harmful ideologies.

Recent image related to this news story

The singer also reflected on her extensive history of activism, having previously stood up for marginalized groups despite facing criticism. She juxtaposed her past advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and opposition to the Gulf War with her current defense of Jewish people, acknowledging the loneliness that often accompanies taking such stands.

Pink addressed the changing tone in public discourse surrounding Israel and Jewish identity, noting that certain terms and accusations have become weaponized in ways that silence nuanced perspectives. She expressed frustration at being misrepresented and having her beliefs mischaracterized without dialogue.

Her post was initially divided into two parts, but after a surge of polarized responses, Pink disabled comments, inadvertently removing part of her own extended explanation. Before this action, responses ranged from critical to supportive, highlighting the divisive nature of the issue.

Separately, Macklemore responded to the ongoing debate by emphasizing that criticism of Israel or calls for Palestinian freedom are not attacks on Jewish individuals. He framed his message as one advocating peace and equality for all oppressed groups globally, listing several nations and communities alongside Palestine in his call for liberation.

Pink’s decision to speak candidly about this complex and sensitive topic underlines the challenges artists face when intersecting political expression with their public personas. Her insistence on clarity and personal accountability in the discourse is a notable moment in the ongoing cultural conversation about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict within the music industry.

Full story & global impact

This article was synthesized and rewritten by MusicTop Editorial from reporting published by variety.com. Read the publisher's report for the complete source context.

Read original source: variety.com