Robert Kraft Defends Banning Macklemore From Ed Sheeran Tour After ‘Free Palestine’ Speech: ‘We Do Not Provide a Platform for Hate Speech’
Published September 14, 2026 · US

New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft has issued a statement defending his decision to create what amounts to a ban on rapper Macklemore performing in support of Ed Sheeran at a number of stadiums following the rapper’s comments regarding Palestine, which t…
Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots and Gillette Stadium, has publicly clarified his role in barring rapper Macklemore from performing on Ed Sheeran’s upcoming concerts at multiple stadiums, including Gillette. The move follows Macklemore’s outspoken statements supporting Palestine during recent New Jersey shows, which provoked backlash from venue operators concerned about the nature of his remarks.
The decision emerged amid tensions sparked by Macklemore’s public advocacy. During performances on September 4 and 5, the rapper expressed solidarity with Palestine, invoking slogans and imagery that some interpreted as controversial or divisive. This prompted Kraft and his associates to take a firm stance against what they considered hate speech, ultimately leading to Macklemore’s removal from the tour dates scheduled for late September.
Related stories
Kraft’s official statement emphasizes the commitment of Gillette Stadium to hosting events that foster inclusivity and reject any form of hate speech. He cited a broader context involving what he described as a history of antisemitic expressions associated with Macklemore’s recent actions and materials displayed during Ed Sheeran’s concerts. Kraft framed the exclusion as necessary to maintain a respectful environment for all attendees, particularly the Jewish community.
Importantly, Kraft delineated his position by acknowledging the suffering of Palestinians and Palestinians’ right to advocate for their cause. However, he stressed that such advocacy must not come at the expense of Jewish communities or obscure the violent role of Hamas, which he referenced as a designated terrorist group responsible for significant suffering on both sides of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Kraft made clear that his intervention was rooted in opposing hate and antisemitism rather than dismissing the Palestinian plight.
Macklemore’s response surfaced via a lengthy social media post, where he attributed his exclusion directly to Kraft. According to the rapper, Kraft coordinated with other stadium owners to enforce a collective ban against his participation on the tour. Macklemore also detailed conversations with Ed Sheeran, who he said was caught in a difficult position due to the controversy and public pressure. The rapper underscored his view that silence or neutrality in conflicts marked by significant power imbalances ultimately sides with oppressors.
The promoter for Ed Sheeran’s U.S. Loop Tour, Messina Touring Group, officially announced the removal of Macklemore from remaining support dates, citing venue restrictions as the primary cause. The statement highlighted the risk of tour cancellations and widespread disruption to fans should Macklemore have remained on the lineup.
Ed Sheeran himself has not publicly addressed the dispute, maintaining a low profile on the matter amidst the unfolding developments. Meanwhile, Kraft expressed willingness to engage directly with Macklemore to discuss the facts and seek common ground, emphasizing shared goals of peace and an end to hatred.
This episode spotlights the complex intersection of entertainment, politics, and social advocacy, particularly when artists use their platform to address contentious geopolitical issues. It also raises questions about the responsibilities of venue owners and promoters in moderating speech and the potential consequences for artists who take explicit political stances.
Details regarding the full scope of discussions between Kraft, Macklemore, and other involved parties remain limited. The controversy underscores ongoing tensions surrounding freedom of expression, activism, and the impact of artists’ statements on their careers and public engagements in an increasingly polarized environment.
Full story & global impact
This article was synthesized and rewritten by MusicTop Editorial from reporting published by variety.com. Read the publisher's report for the complete source context.
Read original source: variety.com