Fox News Veteran Slams Network for ‘Journalistic Malpractice’ Over ‘Choice to Ignore’ Kimberly Guilfoyle Scandal — Then Hours Later Site Published Story About How She Might Be Fired by Trump

Fox News has come under scrutiny for its handling of a developing scandal involving Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former Fox News personality and current U.S. ambassador to Greece. The controversy centers on allegations that Guilfoyle sought a substantial financial bailout from a Trump donor under questionable circumstances.

The situation first gained widespread attention following an investigative report by the Wall Street Journal earlier this month, which detailed Guilfoyle’s reported request for $100,000 to cover a personal credit card debt. The report further highlighted concerns about her conduct as an ambassador, including inquiries into her lifestyle and management style by the State Department’s inspector general.

Despite the high-profile nature of the allegations and their proximity to the Trump administration, Fox News was notably slow to address the story on its digital platforms. Although the network briefly mentioned the matter during a broadcast segment in early October, it refrained from publishing any substantive online coverage for several days.

This editorial choice was sharply criticized by Ken LaCorte, a former senior vice president of Fox News Digital who led the network’s website for a decade. LaCorte publicly condemned Fox News for what he described as a deliberate decision to withhold reporting on the scandal. He argued that ignoring a story of such significance amounted to journalistic negligence, given its prominence across other major news organizations worldwide.

LaCorte’s comments emerged shortly before Fox News finally published an online article addressing the controversy. The piece, released on the evening of October 11, suggested that internal discussions led by President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were underway regarding Guilfoyle’s potential dismissal amid mounting allegations.

According to the report, Trump and Rubio expressed strong dissatisfaction with Guilfoyle’s conduct, particularly in relation to her solicitation of funds from a donor while allegedly offering access to government officials. These developments underscore the growing pressure on Guilfoyle’s position in the administration.

While the details of Fox News’ editorial decision-making remain somewhat opaque, sources familiar with the network’s digital operations indicate that such judgments are typically made below the highest executive levels. The delayed online coverage has raised questions about the network’s commitment to comprehensive reporting on politically sensitive matters involving former staffers.

Kimberly Guilfoyle’s tenure at Fox News, spanning from 2006 to 2018, and her personal connections to high-profile figures—including her past engagement to Donald Trump Jr. and marriage to California Governor Gavin Newsom—add layers of complexity to the unfolding scandal. Her ambassadorial appointment and the subsequent allegations represent a significant challenge to both her career and the broader Trump political sphere.

As the investigation by the State Department continues and public scrutiny intensifies, Fox News’ initial reluctance to cover the story online highlights ongoing tensions within media organizations regarding editorial independence and political affiliations. The network’s eventual decision to report on the matter may reflect an attempt to balance journalistic responsibility with internal sensitivities.

While many questions about the full scope of Guilfoyle’s actions and the potential consequences remain unanswered, the episode serves as a stark reminder of the evolving dynamics between political power, media coverage, and accountability in the current news environment.